#7343: SageNB -- Add a Selenium test suite.
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: timdumol | Owner: boothby
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.2.1
Component: notebook | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author: Mike Hansen, Tim Joseph Dumol
Reviewer: Mitesh Patel | Merged:
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment(by mpatel):
I also haven't used zope.testbrowser, but after reading through its
documentation, I think it's better for "functional" testing than for load
testing. In particular, it [very likely] has better cookie and form-
handling capabilities than FL (actually,
[http://mechanicalcat.net/tech/webunit/ webunit]). On the other hand, FL
already has an infrastructure for concurrent testing and it can load/cache
CSS/images/etc.
Of course, neither is a replacement for Selenium's truly functional tests.
For "functional" tests alone, z.t may be a good choice. For load tests,
FL seems to be a good Pythonic choice that can also go "functional."
However, if we don't mind using other languages, Watir/Celerity or The
Grinder may be better. How important are the load tests? Perhaps we can
build a load test framework on z.t?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7343#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
