#7719: Improvements to complex AGM
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  cremona           |       Owner:  AlexGhitza                   
       Type:  enhancement       |      Status:  needs_review                 
   Priority:  major             |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.1                   
  Component:  basic arithmetic  |    Keywords:  complex agm                  
Work_issues:                    |      Author:  John Cremona, Robert Bradshaw
   Upstream:  N/A               |    Reviewer:  Robert Bradshaw, John Cremona
     Merged:                    |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by cremona):

 The new patch trac_7719-cagm.patch replaces all previous, for ease of
 application -- and also makes clear that just one file is touched
 (rings/complex_number.pyx) though testers should also test
 schemes/elliptic_curves/{period_lattice,ell_number_field,ell_rational_field}.py
 since these all use the code.

 I made this using the "fold" system in mercurial queues, which worked
 fine, though the end result is that I'm the only user listed in the patch.
 If anyone knows how to get back in the credit for Robert Miller, and also
 ylchapuy, please do since the last thing I want to do is take credit for
 Robert's fantastic work on this.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7719#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.


Reply via email to