#7539: primes.p0.spkg with "prime_sieve.c" functionality
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: GeorgSWeber | Owner: rohana
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.3.1
Component: number theory | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author: rohana, GeorgSWeber
Upstream: N/A | Reviewer:
Merged: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by mvngu):
From IRC:
{{{
06:44 < mvngu> The attachments look like a mess to me.
06:45 < SageWWW> They are supposedly diffs
06:45 < mvngu> I downloaded the first attachment, uncompressed it, and
can't
work out which patches to apply in which order.
06:49 < SageWWW> "The first diff contains a (working) subset of the
changes I
made, the second contains all changes."Leif
06:50 < SageWWW> That is in his first email. And he also included the
original
06:51 < mvngu> So Silva.c.orig is the original version. And Silva.c is the
newer version with all changes in the diff's?
06:51 < SageWWW> Perhaps. It would be easier to tell if Leif added
himself to
the authors section of the updated code
06:53 < mvngu> The diff's don't look like standard diff formats. At least
when
I apply them with the command "patch", they failed to
apply.
06:56 < SageWWW> It is extra confusing that Andrew Ohana and Leif
Leonhardy
both made their own updated version of Kevin Stueve's
updated
version of Oliviera e Silva's code.
06:56 < mvngu> I think if you diff Silva.c.orig against Silva.c, you get
the
differences in the newer version (which is Silva.c).
}}}
The attachments look confusing to me. So I have attached what I think is
the sequence of patches to apply on top of the original C code version
`Silva.c.orig`. Starting from `Silva.c.orig`, apply the three patches in
this order:
1. `01_Silva.patch`
1. `02_Silva.patch`
1. `03_Silva.patch`
After applying the above three patches on top of `Silva.c.orig`, you get
the file `Silva.c`. I hope my attachments would resolve some of the
confusion.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7539#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
