#7973: Documentation for submitting a patch is overly confusing
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  gaer                |       Owner:  mvngu     
       Type:  defect              |      Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  major               |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.1
  Component:  documentation       |    Keywords:            
Work_issues:  badly formed patch  |      Author:            
   Upstream:  N/A                 |    Reviewer:            
     Merged:                      |  
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by mvngu):

  * status:  needs_review => needs_work
  * work_issues:  => badly formed patch


Comment:

 You're concatenating three different patches into one file. That would
 result in failures when applying the resulting one file (with the three
 patches):
 {{{
 [mv...@mod sage-main]$ hg qimport http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-
 attachment/ticket/7973/13639.patch && hg qpush
 adding 13639.patch to series file
 applying 13639.patch
 patching file doc/en/developer/producing_patches.rst
 Hunk #1 FAILED at 21
 Hunk #2 FAILED at 58
 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
 doc/en/developer/producing_patches.rst.rej
 patching file doc/en/developer/producing_patches.rst
 Hunk #1 FAILED at 21
 Hunk #2 FAILED at 58
 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
 doc/en/developer/producing_patches.rst.rej
 patch failed, unable to continue (try -v)
 patch failed, rejects left in working dir
 errors during apply, please fix and refresh 13639.patch
 }}}
 Looking at the attachment
 [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/7973/13639.patch
 13639.patch] more closely, I see that the three patches only touch the
 file
 {{{
 doc/en/developer/producing_patches.rst
 }}}
 I have split the three different patches into three different files and
 attached them to this ticket for reference. Applying any one of them
 individually is OK. But if I then first apply one and then any of the
 other two, I'd get hunk failures. So of all the changes in your original
 attachment, which set of changes did you intend to submit for review?
 Also, one minor nit-pick: please reference the ticket number in your
 commit message. The general format of a commit message should be:
 {{{
 trac xxxx: <your-commit-message-here>
 }}}
 where "xxxx" is the ticket number.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7973#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.


Reply via email to