#6863: Implement cusps over number fields
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  cremona        |       Owner:  craigcitro          
       Type:  enhancement    |      Status:  needs_work          
   Priority:  major          |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.1          
  Component:  modular forms  |    Keywords:  number field modular
Work_issues:                 |      Author:                      
   Upstream:  N/A            |    Reviewer:                      
     Merged:                 |  
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------

Comment(by cremona):

 Craig, Thanks for your comments.  Since it's quite a long time since Maite
 actually wrote this I don't think we are in a hurry to start reorganising
 the code as you suggest.  I think that, while we realised that the best
 thing in the long term would be to unify code as you suggest, we did not
 want to do anything which made classical cusps slower, hence the parallel
 implementation.  So if you unify the cusps code (which I would like to see
 in the long run) it will be necessary to test carefully that there is no
 speed regression for Q-cusps.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6863#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.


Reply via email to