#8216: Make David Perkinson's sandpile 2.0 module an optional package
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: mhampton | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.3.3
Component: optional packages | Keywords: sandpile
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment(by wdj):
Replying to [comment:4 mhampton]:
> I don't optional packages require a vote, no. Making a package standard
does.
>
Okay.
> Yes, I guess this does depend on 8217, although for review purposes it
isn't in the sense that "sage -i 4ti2.p0" will work
> wether or not its experimental or optional.
What would you like the review to consist of?
I have read the documentation and used the functions in the spkg and the
sandpile.sage file. Is sandpile.sage in this spkg?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8216#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
