#8229: gap_packages-4.4.12 updated
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  dimpase   |       Owner:  tbd              
       Type:  defect    |      Status:  needs_work       
   Priority:  major     |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.3       
  Component:  packages  |    Keywords:  GAP, GAP packages
     Author:            |    Upstream:  N/A              
   Reviewer:            |      Merged:                   
Work_issues:            |  
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------

Comment(by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:13 wdj]:


 I do not know what happens to the
 > Replying to [comment:12 dimpase]:
 > > Replying to [comment:11 wdj]:
 > > > I did it again on a fresh install. Same problem.
 > > omg...
 > >
 > > rename all files gap*4.4.10*.spkg in spkg/standard to something that
 is not recognised as spkg
 > > (I normally just erase them, so perhaps this might be the root of the
 problem for you)
 >
 >
 > ???!!!!
 > This is not the correct way to build a package!
 >
 >
 > >
 > > then redo all the package installs:
 > > sage -f gap*...
 > >
 > > it can also be that you have  scripts in, say, /usr/local/bin pointing
 out to wrong installation of sage
 > >
 > > Failing all this, you can rebuild the whole sage from scratch with
 right spkgs corresponding to 4.4.12.
 > >
 >
 >
 > I have tried your instructions on two different macs (both running 4.3.2
 and 10.6.2) and a linux machine (running ubuntu 9.10).
 > Same error on all machines. There is something wrong with
 >
 > (1) make clone

 Sorry, but I asked you to do it on a *clean install*, not on a clone...

 > (2) apply trac-8150
 > (3) sage -f gap-4.4.12
 > (4) sage -f gap_packages.
 >
 > The last step is where the error occurs on every machine.
 >
 > As far as I know, this is the way it is *supposed* to work.
 >
 > To be as clear as I can, you are *not* supposed to ask people to delete
 gap-4.4.10 manually at any stage of the install. Maybe if this is not
 clear, it should be moved to sage-support or sage-devel?
 >
 > I am marking this as needs work.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8229#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to