#8229: gap_packages-4.4.12 updated
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.3.3
Component: packages | Keywords: GAP, GAP packages
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by dimpase):
* status: needs_info => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:18 wdj]:
There was a trivial typo in spkg-install that prevented all
of guava from being compiled.
I fixed it, and put the new version of the spkg here
[http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dima/packages/gap_packages-4.4.12_2.spkg]
Please reinstall and test the relevant part.
I tested on Linux that -t -optional passes on sage/coding/ after this fix.
Thanks,
Dima
> Okay, modulo the sage -f bug reported in
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8236, here is what I have done.
>
> On a mac 10.6.2 machine running sage 4.3.2, I applied trac-8150, then
sage -f gap-4.4.12, then sage -f gap_packages, then sage -f database_gap,
as indicated in the instructions above. All went fine and sage -testall
passes. I then ran sage -testall --optional. I could see only one related
failure and it might or might not be minor. Apparently when the new
gap_packages skpg was built, it was not set to compile and install the
guava C code written by J Leon. This caused 2 failures. When I compiled
the code (the traceback tells you how), that test passed. I tested the
packages with some random GAP commands and everything else seems to be
installed and working fine.
>
> If this trac ticket is to judge only gap-4.4.12, then I give it a
positive review. If it is to also include gap_packages then maybe I have
some reservations (database_gap seems fine though). Since gap_packages is
in the title of the ticket, I am hesitant to give this a positive review
yet. I don't know if Leon's code is so old that it will not compile on
some machines, in which case this is not a problem for this ticket. So, I
am marking this as needs info.
>
>
>
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8229#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
