#8422: ChainPoset in broken for small input
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  hivert          |       Owner:  sage-combinat
       Type:  defect          |      Status:  needs_review 
   Priority:  major           |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.4   
  Component:  combinatorics   |    Keywords:  ChainPoset   
     Author:  Florent Hivert  |    Upstream:  N/A          
   Reviewer:                  |      Merged:               
Work_issues:                  |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):

  * status:  new => needs_review
  * author:  => Florent Hivert


Old description:

> For n>2 the answer is correct:
> {{{
> sage: Posets.ChainPoset(3).size()
> 3
> sage: Posets.ChainPoset(4).size()
> 4
> sage: Posets.ChainPoset(5).size()
> 5
> }}}
> However:
> {{{
> sage: Posets.ChainPoset(2).size()
> 1
> sage: Posets.ChainPoset(1).size()
> ...
> ValueError: not valid poset data.
> }}}

New description:

 For n>2 the answer is correct:
 {{{
 sage: Posets.ChainPoset(3).size()
 3
 sage: Posets.ChainPoset(4).size()
 4
 sage: Posets.ChainPoset(5).size()
 5
 }}}
 However:
 {{{
 sage: Posets.ChainPoset(2).size()
 1
 sage: Posets.ChainPoset(1).size()
 ...
 ValueError: not valid poset data.
 }}}
 {{{AntichainPosets}}} show the same wrong behavior.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8422#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to