#8133: changing the string representation of Dirichlet charachters
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: wuthrich | Owner: craigcitro
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.4
Component: modular forms | Keywords: dirichlet characters
Author: Chris Wuthrich | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: John Cremona | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by cremona):
After 4 days, there were two responses on sage-nt: a positive one from
William, and a suggestion for a few further changes from Robert Bradshaw
(see http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sage-
nt/browse_thread/thread/be56e6f0e29b44e8).
{{{
I certainly like the new representation better. Perhaps the _latex_
method should use \mapsto rather than the ASCII art |-->, but it
should certainly produce \zeta_{n}^{k} rather than returning just
plain _repr_. Another alternative short representation would be
something like
(31, 41, 37) |--> (1, 1, zeta4)
- Robert
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8133#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
