#8451: improve galois representation for elliptic curves
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  wuthrich         |       Owner:  cremona                          
                    
       Type:  defect           |      Status:  needs_review                     
                    
   Priority:  major            |   Milestone:  sage-4.4                         
                    
  Component:  elliptic curves  |    Keywords:  elliptic curves, galois 
representation, is_surjective
     Author:  Chris Wuthrich   |    Upstream:  N/A                              
                    
   Reviewer:                   |      Merged:                                   
                    
Work_issues:                   |  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by was):

 From Drew Sutherland, who is an expert on this algorithm:

 "Hi William,

 I am in Montreal at the moment preparing for a talk, but I would be happy
 to take a look at it this weekend when I should have some time. One thing
 that would be helpful is to be able to see the new version of

   sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/gal_reps.py

 in its entirety. Currently, I can browse the old version and look at the
 diff, but it would be easier to just read linearly through the new
 version.

 A very useful test would be to run the new code on some substantial subset
 of the Cremona database and compare the results to the answer you get from
 my code. Is this something that can easily be done now that you have
 integrated my code into Sage?

 Drew

 p.s. I can say that I agree with the comment that the mod 3 rep is
 surjective if and only if the 3-division poly has Galois group S_4.
 Another way to see this is to look at the Galois group of the instantiated
 modular polynomial Phi_3(X,j(E)), which happens to be isomorphic to the
 Galois group of the 3-division poly (3 is special in this regard) and is
 also isomorphic to the image of the mod 3 Galois rep in PGL(2,3)."

 My response, is that yes, I'm sure we can set you up with everything you
 want above.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8451#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to