#8679: conventions for spkg names, rewriting sage-spkg
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.4
Component: packages | Keywords:
Author: John Palmieri | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by ddrake):
Replying to [comment:9 ddrake]:
> I'm doing a full build of Sage right now. I took all the spkgs in
spkg/standard, extracted them, and re-made them with "sage -pkg" (and
"sage -pkg_nc") after applying the patch here. I'll report the results of
the build, although so far it seems fine.
The build went fine and all tests pass, so the new script produces spkgs
that work perfectly well.
Just as an idea, would it make sense to have "sage -pkg" add checksums, as
in #329?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8679#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
