#8679: conventions for spkg names, rewriting sage-spkg
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.4
Component: packages | Keywords:
Author: John Palmieri | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: William Stein, Dan Drake | Merged:
Work_issues: |
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Changes (by ddrake):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => William Stein, Dan Drake
Comment:
Replying to [comment:11 jhpalmieri]:
> Replying to [comment:10 ddrake]:
> > Just as an idea, would it make sense to have "sage -pkg" add
checksums, as in #329?
>
> I think that sounds good, but it belongs on another ticket.
Oh, of course. I've created #8690 for that.
It seems we've met William's criteria for a positive review. I've created
some spkgs (in Linux and OS X) with this patch applied, and everything
works properly. I think we can call this a positive review.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8679#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
