#8790: improve doctest coverage of logic/logic.py
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: mvngu | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.4.1
Component: documentation | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
As the subject says. Currently, the coverage of `sage/logic/logic.py` in
Sage 4.4 is:
{{{
[mv...@sage sage-4.4]$ ./sage -coverage devel/sage-
main/sage/logic/logic.py
----------------------------------------------------------------------
devel/sage-main/sage/logic/logic.py
ERROR: Please add a `TestSuite(s).run()` doctest.
SCORE devel/sage-main/sage/logic/logic.py: 16% (3 of 18)
Missing documentation:
* combine(self, statement1, statement2):
* simplify(self, table):
* prove(self, statement):
Missing doctests:
* get_bit(x, c):
* eval(toks):
* eval_ltor_toks(lrtoks):
* reduce_bins(lrtoks):
* reduce_monos(lrtoks):
* eval_mon_op(args):
* eval_bin_op(args):
* eval_and_op(lval, rval):
* eval_or_op(lval, rval):
* eval_ifthen_op(lval, rval):
* eval_iff_op(lval, rval):
* tokenize(s, toks):
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8790>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
