#8972: Inversion and fraction fields for power series rings
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  SimonKing   |       Owner:  AlexGhitza                       
       Type:  defect      |      Status:  needs_review                     
   Priority:  major       |   Milestone:  sage-4.4.2                       
  Component:  algebra     |    Keywords:  power series ring, fraction field
     Author:  Simon King  |    Upstream:  N/A                              
   Reviewer:              |      Merged:                                   
Work_issues:              |  
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment(by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:11 SimonKing]:
 > I forgot one remark:
 >
 > I don't know how this happens, but the ``truncate`` method of Laurent
 series behaves different than before, although the ``truncate`` method of
 power series did not change:

 Outch, now I see my mistake.

  * The documentation of ``LaurentSeries.truncate`` states that indeed it
 returns a Laurent series. It does not have a doc test, so, I will add one.

  * The old doc test of ``PowerSeries.truncate`` fails with my patch. The
 reason is that the ''power'' series constructed in this doc test is now in
 fact a ''Laurent'' series; this is what made me believe that the behaviour
 of the method has changed. So, I only have to change the doc test.

 But before submitting a patch to add/correct these doc tests, I'll wait
 for input of a referee.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8972#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to