#9160: Singular - change timestamp of files and sort out SAGE64 issue.
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: drkirkby | Owner:
GeorgSWeber
Type: defect | Status:
positive_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone:
sage-4.4.4
Component: build | Keywords:
Author: David Kirkby and Willem Jan Palenstijn | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Changes (by leif):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
Comment:
{{{
Successfully installed singular-3.1.0.4.p6
You can safely delete the temporary build directory
/home/leif/sage-4.4.4.alpha0/spkg/build/singular-3.1.0.4.p6
Making Sage/Python scripts relocatable...
Making script relocatable
Finished installing singular-3.1.0.4.p6.spkg
l...@californication:~/sage-4.4.4.alpha0$ uname -a
Linux californication 2.6.28-19-generic #61-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 26 23:35:15
UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
l...@californication:~/sage-4.4.4.alpha0$ ./sage -t -long
devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular-cdefs.pxi"
[4.3 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/__init__.py"
[0.2 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx"
[6.6 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/ring.pyx"
[4.9 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/function_factory.py"
[4.3 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/groebner_strategy.pyx"
[4.5 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pxi"
[0.2 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/option.pyx"
[4.9 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/polynomial.pyx"
[4.4 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx"
[4.9 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 39.2 seconds
}}}
(Ubuntu 9.04 32-bit/Pentium4, new spkg installed on Sage 4.4.4.alpha0)
I'm currently too tired to upload a reviewer patch adding more comments to
{{{SPKG.txt}}} and perhaps {{{spkg-install}}}; it should perhaps also
contain a link to the sage-devel thread [http://groups.google.com/group
/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/fbf5b7f781c3f523# "Is flex needed to
build Sage?"] which has further suggestions.
We could also update the ticket description to briefly reflect the
outcome.
----
> [...] A huge amount of effort has gone into Singular, and I greatly
> appreciate that it is open source. I think the Sage project has a
> very good relationship with the Singular project, and I hope criticism
> of the quality of their work will be constructive and not offensive.
> [...][[BR]]
> [[BR]]
> It would be cool if some the ideas you guys have could be added to[[BR]]
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/days23.5 [[BR]]
> which is the joint Sage/Singular meeting this summer.[[BR]]
> [[BR]]
> -- William
(from the sage-devel thread)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9160#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
