#9296: Add lattice computations for convex polyhedral cones
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  vbraun              |       Owner:  mhampton    
       Type:  enhancement         |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major               |   Milestone:  sage-4.5    
  Component:  geometry            |    Keywords:              
     Author:  Volker Braun        |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:  Andrey Novoseltsev  |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                      |  
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by vbraun):

  * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Comment:

 In the patch above I renamed the methods
   * `N_basis` -> `sublattice_basis`
   * `N_projection` -> `sublattice_projection`
   * `N_complement_basis` -> `sublattice_complement_basis`
   * `N_quotient_basis` -> `sublattice_quotient_basis`
   * `M_basis` -> `perpendicular_sublattice_basis`
   * `M_quotient_basis` -> `perpendicular_quotient_basis`
 and rewrote the documentation.

 I dediced on `sublattice` instead of `spanned_lattice` because its shorter
 and differentiates better the already-existing method `lattice()` (which
 returns the ambient lattice). Let me know what you think...

 I'm not sure if the lattice computations are a used often enough "by hand"
 to warrant the additional `toric_M_N_lattices` interface. Since we can add
 that always later its not a big priority for me right now.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9296#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to