#9359: Get number field coverage up to 100%
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: davidloeffler | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5
Component: number fields | Keywords: doctest
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by lftabera):
Do you thing that
{{{
# TODO -- relative extensions need to be completely
rewritten, so one
# can get easy access to representation of elements in
their relative
# form. Functions like matrix below can't be done until
relative
# extensions are re-written this way. Also there needs to
be class
# hierarchy for number field elements, integers, etc.
This is a
# nontrivial project, and it needs somebody to attack it.
I'm amazed
# how long this has gone unattacked.
# Relative elements need to be a derived class or
something. This is
# terrible as it is now.
}}}
is no longer valid?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9359#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
