#9359: Get number field coverage up to 100%
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: davidloeffler | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5
Component: number fields | Keywords: doctest
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by lftabera):
Well, I think that it still applies the fact that relative number fields
are slow. The construction of an underlying absolute number field to make
computations has coefficient explosion problems. Also, there should be
smarter calls to pari_nf pari_rnf that are operations that can be very
costly.
So yes, the code works but it is inefficient in some interesting cases.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9359#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
