#9193: Proveable computation of L-functions (Dokchitser procedure)
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5
Component: number theory | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by robertwb):
* status: new => needs_work
Comment:
The dependency should have been #9156 (which is a tiny, now merged,
ticket) rather than #9165.
This still needs work in two ways. Firstly, it needs more
doctests/documentation (though most of the important/tricky functions are
already done), and there is also a bug in computing the tail of the
G-function summation that I'm still tracking down. I did some work towards
this during Sage Days 22, and even thought about it a touch this week, but
haven't quite gotten to the bottom of it.
{{{
$ sage -coverage sage/lfunctions/lfunction.py
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage/lfunctions/lfunction.py
ERROR: Please add a `TestSuite(s).run()` doctest.
SCORE sage/lfunctions/lfunction.py: 61% (19 of 31)
$ sage -coverage sage/lfunctions/G_function.py
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage/lfunctions/G_function.py
ERROR: Please add a `TestSuite(s).run()` doctest.
SCORE sage/lfunctions/G_function.py: 59% (13 of 22)
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9193#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
