#191: factorization table / database
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-feature
Component: factorization | Resolution:
Keywords: | Author:
Upstream: N/A | Reviewer:
Merged: | Work_issues:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by davidloeffler):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
Comment:
What I usually do in this situation is to set the ticket to "needs review"
with a message saying I think it ought to be closed. Then if someone else
agrees, we can set it to "positive review", and then it'll show up in the
list of tickets to be merged in the next release. Then the release manager
will close it. In this case, I've put it at "positive review", since I
agree with your claim that it should be fixed.
BTW, I'm not sure "duplicate" is fair; this ticket has been open for
years, so #7239 was a duplicate of this one rather than the other way
round. Perhaps "fixed" is the most appropriate resolution. But that is for
the release manager to decide.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/191#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
