#9368: sage_fortran ignores SAGE64 except on Solaris/OpenSolaris
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: drkirkby | Owner: GeorgSWeber
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-4.5.1
Component: build | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: | Author: David Kirkby
Upstream: N/A | Reviewer: Robert Miller
Merged: sage-4.5.alpha1 | Work_issues:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
Replying to [comment:9 was]:
> I'm re-opening this ticket because the fortran-20100629.spkg is broken.
On OS X, it installs g95 now, whereas the previous fortran spkg (the one
in sage-4.4.4) installs gfortran. Somebody was a bit sloppy.
>
> When this package is properly updated for OS X, make sure to type
>
> ./sage -sh
> local/bin/sage_fortran.bin --version
>
> and ensure that you've actually got gfortran installed, not g95. The
gfortran binary for OS X is quad-architecture -- it covers 32 and 64-bit
on both ppc and intel.
Since I created it, I guess you are saying I was sloppy. It is hard to
know how I can check this any more, given it builds for me on OS X
(bsd.math) using
* My normal environment
* Your script.
It also builds for everyone else. There are numerous reports of successful
builds on OS X.
Would it be sensible to remove 'g95' from the package, and ensure that the
packages assumes 'gfortran' - then the perl script can be removed.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9368#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
