#9368: sage_fortran ignores SAGE64 except on Solaris/OpenSolaris
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: drkirkby | Owner: GeorgSWeber
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-4.5
Component: build | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: | Author: David Kirkby, William Stein
Upstream: N/A | Reviewer: Robert Miller
Merged: sage-4.5.rc2 | Work_issues:
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment(by rlm):
Replying to [comment:18 drkirkby]:
> I'm afraid to say I don't share your confidence that you and Robert have
tracked this down completely, though you have found a serious flaw.
Of course you don't share the same confidence, you didn't trace the bug
down to its source like we did. It was the configure script for the R spkg
calling a very specific fortran command that made the build eventually
fail. It is very easy to imagine that none of the other configure scripts
called fortran in this way. In fact, they couldn't have or the build would
have failed earlier.
> However, I'm not convinced this was William's problem, as the
{{{$SAGE_LOCAL/bin/sage_fortain}}} script '''must''' have been working at
one point, otherwise ATLAS, Linpack, Numpy and other things that used
Fortran would not have built.
Define working.
> However, when I looked at William's $SAGE_LOCAL/bin/sage_fortran, it had
only:
>
> {{{
> #!/bin/sh
> }}}
As I pointed out earlier, this is just plain wrong!
> Unless I'm mistaken...
You are!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9368#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
