#9281: METATICKET - missing spkg-check files / OpenSolaris & Solaris 10 test
results.
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: drkirkby | Owner: drkirkby
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-wishlist
Component: spkg-check | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
Replying to [comment:14 leif]:
> I think we should separate the ''presence'' of {{{spkg-check}}} from
testsuite results, i.e. create a single platform-independent ticket that
lists spkg improvement progress.
I thought about this some more. I can't see what is wrong with using this
ticket to have a simple yes/no whether the package has a {{{spkg-check}}}
file. If not, just provide a trac number to where that particular spkg-
check file is being discussed. For gsl for instance, we have
"Yes, but broken #9531"
So people interested know that more details of the issue can be found at
#9531.
If you feel the need to have longer comments, or more columns devoted to
the status of {{{spkg-check}}} then another ticket would be better.
When you look at the {{{spkg-install}}} and {{{spkg-check}}} it is
worrying how many simple ignore errors. Sometimes they get reported, but
don't exit with 1. Other times they are just ignored.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9281#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
