#9533: Update GSL to the latest upstream release (1.14) & permit parallel
building.
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: drkirkby | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5.1
Component: packages | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
I'm convinced this is ok built in parallel. I tested it several times in
parallel (outside of Sage) before you even mentioned it. But after you
said this, I used $MAKE in {{{spkg-install}}} and systematically checked
it on different systems
* 19 parallel builds on a Sun Ultra 27, with !OpenSolaris using between 2
and 1000 threads.
* 5 parallel builds on bsd.math, with OS 10.6, using 4 threads.
* 5 parallel builds on sage.math, with Ubunta, using 8 threads.
* 3 parallel builds on a Sun Blade 2000, with Solaris 10, using between 2
and 4 threads. (Code compiled 64-bit)
* 3 parallel builds on a Sun Blade 2000, with Solaris 10, using between 2
and 4 threads. (Code compiled 32-bit)
In all cases, all the self-tests for GSL passed.
I've run the doctests on sage.math. I was quite expecting to get a few
failures due to different results from different algorithms that might be
used in the GSL library, but to my surprise:
{{{
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 1095.8 seconds
kir...@sage:/scratch/kirkby/sage-4.5$
}}}
Here's a link to the package.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/gsl-1.14.spkg
I'm going to upload 3 patches. The first was all the updates. The second
uses {{{$MAKE}} and the final one just prints an informative message when
the tests pass. Is there a sensible way of reversing these patches once
they are commited, so I don't need 3 of them? Anyway, the patches are for
review only. They don't need to be applied to the package.
The first patch is quite large, as it removes a big patch.
Dave
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9533#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.