#9549: InfinitePolynomialRing_sparse.is_field lacks `proof=...` option
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: mmezzarobba | Owner: malb
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5.2
Component: commutative algebra | Keywords:
Author: Marc Mezzarobba | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Mike Hansen | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by mmezzarobba):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:3 mhansen]:
> You probably don't want the line
>
> {{{
> print "coucou"
> }}}
>
> in the patch.
Sorry--I was sure I had double-checked that it wasn't in the patch after
uploading it... :-/ Thanks for spotting my blunder.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9549#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
