#9533: Update GSL to the latest upstream release (1.14) & permit parallel
building.
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  drkirkby      |       Owner:  tbd         
       Type:  enhancement   |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major         |   Milestone:  sage-4.5.2  
  Component:  packages      |    Keywords:              
     Author:  David Kirkby  |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:                |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                |  
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------

Comment(by drkirkby):

 Replying to [comment:26 leif]:
 > As a final change, could we clarify the ATLAS/CBLAS issue in
 {{{SPKG.txt}}}, i.e.
 >  * Dependencies: '''None''' - GSL does currently '''not''' depend on any
 other Sage package (though ATLAS is currently listed in
 {{{spkg/standard/deps}}}
 >  * Add a ''"Special Update/Build Instructions"'' section that mentions
 that GSL could '''in principle''' use ATLAS's CBLAS implementation rather
 than the one shipped with GSL (but so far never did in Sage).
 >

 Sure. I made a few other changes to that file too - hopefully to your
 approval. No code was changed.

 > Currently building Sage 4.5.1 with GSL 1.14 from scratch...

 Good.

 > (I've already tested the spkg with 4.5 "final" on two machines, but only
 by forcing installation of the new package. This btw discovered even more
 flaws in the doctesting "frame"work regarding parallel testing and
 timeouts on the slower machine...)

 You do not surprise me with regard to the doctesting framework. However,
 before wasting any time on them, do check to see if there are any patches
 recently added to trac for this, as I know there were several such
 patches. I'm not the release manager, but if I were, I'd get those patches
 in on the alpha0. If you can't rely on the test code, what can you rely
 on?

 Dave

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9533#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to