#9581: edge_incident bug in generic_graph.py
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  vdelecroix    |       Owner:  vdelecroix
       Type:  defect        |      Status:  new       
   Priority:  major         |   Milestone:  sage-4.5.2
  Component:  graph theory  |    Keywords:  graph     
     Author:  vdelecroix    |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:                |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                |  
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
 Currently, the edge_incident method of generic graph calls edge_boundary
 which first take a lot of time and secondly does not work

 {{{
 sage: G = Graph(loops=True)
 sage: G.add_edge(0,0)
 sage: G.edges()
 [(0, 0, None)]
 sage: list(G.edge_iterator(0))
 [(0, 0, None)]
 sage: G.edges_incident(0)
 []
 }}}

 The ticket also aims to reduce multiple calls (edge_boundary does not call
 directly vertex_iterator as it should).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9581>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to