#9590: Doctest failures in cone.py and toric_lattice_element.pyx on 32-bit Linux
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: mhampton
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.5.2
Component: geometry | Keywords:
Author: Andrey Novoseltsev | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment(by novoselt):
Replying to [comment:2 leif]:
> We could have added the hash codes for 32-bit systems, too, instead.
We could, but I don't know how to get those values for 32-bit systems on
64-bit ones and as I understand those numbers don't have any sense anyway
and can potentially change. So these doctests just check that `hash` can
be used and it returns the same value. If adding 32-bit hashes would be
better, please add them.
I find it very peculiar how slow is `polyhedra.py` in this test. On
sage.math most tests are a little bit faster, but this one takes only 41
second! On my quite old Mobile AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (1.8GHz) results are
closer to those above, but `polyhedra.py` still tests only in 74 seconds!
Is it just the difference between 32 and 64 bits?..
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9590#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
