#9590: Doctest failures in cone.py and toric_lattice_element.pyx on 32-bit Linux
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  mpatel              |       Owner:  mhampton    
       Type:  defect              |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  blocker             |   Milestone:  sage-4.5.2  
  Component:  geometry            |    Keywords:              
     Author:  Andrey Novoseltsev  |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:                      |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                      |  
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment(by leif):

 Replying to [comment:3 novoselt]:
 > I find it very peculiar how slow is `polyhedra.py` in this test. On
 sage.math most tests are a little bit faster, but this one takes only 41
 second! On my quite old Mobile AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (1.8GHz) results are
 closer to those above, but `polyhedra.py` still tests only in 74 seconds!
 Is it just the difference between 32 and 64 bits?..

 This is on an otherwise idle Core2 (64-bit):
 {{{
 #!sh
 l...@quadriga:~/sage-4.5.2.alpha0$ ./sage -t -long
 devel/sage/sage/geometry/
 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/geometry/__init__.py"
          [0.0 s]
 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/geometry/toric_lattice_element.pyx"
          [1.0 s]
 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/geometry/toric_lattice.py"
          [1.0 s]
 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/geometry/polytope.py"
          [1.0 s]
 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/geometry/lattice_polytope.py"
          [5.1 s]
 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/geometry/fan.py"
          [4.7 s]
 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/geometry/cone.py"
          [3.3 s]
 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/geometry/all.py"
          [0.0 s]
 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/geometry/polyhedra.py"
          [58.7 s]

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 All tests passed!
 Total time for all tests: 74.9 seconds
 }}}

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9590#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to