#9343: upgrade pari to version 2.4.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: was
| Owner: jdemeyer
Type: enhancement
| Status: new
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-4.5.2
Component: packages
| Keywords:
Author: Robert Bradshaw, John Cremona, Jeroen Demeyer, William Stein,
David Kirkby | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer:
| Merged:
Work_issues:
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment(by drkirkby):
There were several failures on t2.math.washington.edu. I've put details
of the hardware here, since over time hardware changes, so anyone looking
back in a couple of years will be able to know the exact conditions.
== Hardware and software configuration of t2.math.washington.edu ==
* [http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/servers/sparc-
enterprise/t-series/031584.htm Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 Server]
* 2 x 1167 MHz [http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-
storage/microelectronics/031459.htm UltraSPARC T2 PLUS] processors. (16
cores and 128 hardware threads in total).
* 32 GB RAM
* No swap devices configured.
* Solaris 10 update 7 (5/09)
* gcc 4.4.1 configured to use the Sun linker and Sun assembler.
* Sage was built in on a local ZFS file system as a 32-bit application.
See the file Solaris-10-SPARC-ptestlong-failures.log
{{{
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long local/lib/python2.6/site-
packages/sagenb-0.8.1-py2.6.egg/sagenb/misc/sageinspect.py # 1 doctests
failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/lfunctions/dokchitser.py # 4
doctests failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx # 1
doctests failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/geometry/toric_lattice_element.pyx
# 1 doctests failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/geometry/cone.py # 1 doctests
failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc/randstate.pyx # 15 doctests
failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/libs/pari/gen.pyx # 11 doctests
failed
sage -t -long
devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_number_field.py # 1 doctests
failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/rings/residue_field.pyx # 1
doctests failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/class_group.py #
2 doctests failed
sage -t -long
devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_element.py # 1 doctests
failed
sage -t -long
devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py # 2 doctests
failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/rings/qqbar.py # 1 doctests failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py
# 2 doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 6622.9 seconds
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9343#comment:153>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
