#6456: Upgrade cvxopt in sage from 0.9 to 1.1.2
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  was               |       Owner:  mabshoff  
       Type:  defect            |      Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  major             |   Milestone:  sage-4.5.2
  Component:  packages          |    Keywords:            
     Author:  schilly, dimpase  |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:                    |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                    |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by drkirkby):

 Replying to [comment:67 pjeremy]:

 > There is little point in upgrading to a package that is known to be
 broken.

 Agreed.

 I don't think some of the people commenting on the ticket realise what
 that warning is about. In fact, I personally feel gcc should consider that
 an error and not just issue a warning. I doubt the Sun compiler would
 permit that code.


 > This particular bug does not appear to be present in cvxopt-0.9 (at
 least I can't find the "incompatible pointer type" warnings in either my
 own or boxen builds)

 Me neither. That bug is a regression.

 > so by upgrading, we would be introducing a regression into Sage.

 Yes.

 > I am very concerned at this "release it now, we'll make it work later"
 mentality.

 Me too. There is '''far''' too much emphasis in Sage of adding features
 and far too little in controlling quality. This ticket seems to be a prime
 example of that.

 > If Sage is going to be a viable alternative to the M's, it needs to be
 trustworthy -

 Yes.

 > complaints of "feature X is missing" are easily rectified, claims of
 "Sage gave me wrong answers" can quickly turn into "you can't trust the
 output from Sage" and are far more difficult to refute.

 Yes. Likewise complaints of Sage crashed damages Sage's reputation. The
 bug you found could certainly cause a crash.

 Dave

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6456#comment:70>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to