#9720: Add random echelonizable matrices to matrix/constructor.py
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  bwonderly       |       Owner:  jason, was  
       Type:  enhancement     |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major           |   Milestone:  sage-4.5.3  
  Component:  linear algebra  |    Keywords:              
     Author:  Billy Wonderly  |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:                  |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                  |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

Comment(by bwonderly):

 Replying to [comment:2 wdj]:
 > Applies fine to 4.5.2.rc0.
 >
 > Two extremely minor comments off the top of my head:
 >
 > 1. "Generate a matrix of a desired size and rank, over a desired field,
 >        whose reduced row-echelon form has only whole values."
 > IMHO, "integral" sounds better than "whole".

 I agree completely and have made the change in the v2 patch.

 > 2. It seems to me that, from the point of view of the functionality,
 > using base_ring = ZZ returns the same result as base_ring = QQ.
 > (I understand that over QQ the rref algorithm might be different than
 over
 > ZZ, but it seems to me that for the matrices you compute in the
 > random_echelonizable_matrix function, the rref algorithm(s) yield
 > the same result either way. Correct?
 >

 Yes, the rref algorithm yields the same result with base_ring as ZZ or QQ.
 However, as these matrices are going to be used primarily as student
 example problems I think it would be better to keep the default as QQ.
 Although there should be a series of row operations without introducing
 fractions that achieves rref, a student will likely want to use fractions
 as they row-reduce an output matrix, and the rescale_row or
 add_multiple_of_row functions will complain if fractions are introduced
 working with a matrix over ZZ.
 >
 >

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9720#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to