#9750: Document that PARI no longer assumes more than GRH
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: documentation | Keywords:
Author: Jeroen Demeyer | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: John Cremona | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):
* cc: cremona (added)
* status: positive_review => needs_work
Comment:
Replying to [comment:4 cremona]:
> Is there a good reference, say in the PARI reference manual, for the GRH
assumptions?
Good point, I added a reference to the PARI/GP User's Guide in the
bnfcertify() documentation. The new patch replaces the previous two
patches. John, can you re-review?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9750#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
