#9343: Upgrade PARI to svn snapshot 12577 - a pre-release of PARI 2.4.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
   Reporter:  was                                                               
          |       Owner:  jdemeyer    
       Type:  enhancement                                                       
          |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major                                                             
          |   Milestone:  sage-4.6    
  Component:  packages                                                          
          |    Keywords:              
     Author:  Robert Bradshaw, John Cremona, Jeroen Demeyer, William Stein, 
David Kirkby  |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:                                                                    
          |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                                                                    
          |  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Comment(by davidloeffler):

 Replying to [comment:235 drkirkby]:

 > Does anyone know what the result should be? For the first result, I get
 the '''real number''' {{{2.9757207403766761469671194565}}} but the
 expected value is the '''complex number'''
 {{{2.9757207403766761469671194565 -
 1.2983430720865060515202099613e-47*I}}} So for the real part I get
 '''exactly''' the same number, but I get no imaginary part whatsoever.
 >
 > I assume someone here must know the maths behind this, and know whether
 the result is supposed to be real or complex. If it should really be real
 (so the number I got is actually the more accurate of the two), then
 putting dots would be '''very''' dangerous. Then a result of
 {{{2.9757207403766761469671194565 + 1e300*I}}} would still pass! That's
 almost entirely imaginary, with a very small real part in comparison to
 the massive imaginary component.

 Maybe rather than directly testing the answer, one could do something like
 this:
 {{{
 sage: x = [calculation]; abs(x - 2.975975720740376676146967119) < 10^(-27)
 True
 }}}
 That would be less dangerous, while still allowing the necessary
 flexibility.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9343#comment:236>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to