#9343: Upgrade PARI to svn snapshot 12577 - a pre-release of PARI 2.4.3.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: was
| Owner: jdemeyer
Type: enhancement
| Status: positive_review
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: packages
| Keywords:
Author: Robert Bradshaw, John Cremona, Jeroen Demeyer, William Stein,
David Kirkby | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Robert Bradshaw, John Cremona, Jeroen Demeyer, William Stein,
David Kirkby, François Bisse, Leif Leonhardy | Merged:
Work_issues:
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Changes (by drkirkby):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => Robert Bradshaw, John Cremona, Jeroen Demeyer, William
Stein, David Kirkby, François Bisse, Leif
Leonhardy
Comment:
Replying to [comment:245 cremona]:
> Jeroen is right. Almost all (and maybe all) the doctests in Sage which
are tagged 32/64 bit are a result of this feature of pari's way of
handling multi-precision floating point arithmetic.
OK, fair point. Now I understand. I was under the impression 100 bits were
being used.
After applying Jeroen's patch
{{{
drkir...@hawk:~/sage-4.6.prealpha0$ ./sage -t -long
devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py
sage -t -long
"devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py"
[30.1 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 30.2 seconds
}}}
I've set this to positive review.
I copied all the authors to reviewers, as I think everyone that has wrote
part of it has reviewed part of it. I also added Leif and François as
reviewers, as they have contributed too. But I've not done an extensive
search to see who should be on the reviewer and the author list. I suspect
there are some missing.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9343#comment:246>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
