#9766: Cliquer - Update Upstream contact
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  ncohen          |         Owner:  drkirkby                   
     Type:  defect          |        Status:  closed                     
 Priority:  major           |     Milestone:  sage-4.5.3                 
Component:  packages        |    Resolution:  fixed                      
 Keywords:                  |        Author:  Nathann Cohen, David Kirkby
 Upstream:  N/A             |      Reviewer:  David Kirkby, Mitesh Patel 
   Merged:  sage-4.5.3.rc0  |   Work_issues:                             
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------

Comment(by leif):

 Replying to [comment:14 drkirkby]:
 > Replying to [comment:13 mpatel]:
 > > Since we build Cliquer in Sage with make instead of with SCons (see
 #9804), should we include SCons in the dependency list in `SPKG.txt`?
 >
 > No, we should not. I'll create a new patch and provide a new package in
 a minute. It wont take me long to delete one line.
 >
 > > If we do, should we add a note that SCons is not a Cliquer dependency
 ''in Sage''?
 >
 > I don't know where you would add a note that SCons is not a Cliquer
 dependency. Where would you propose to add such a note?

 I think it's worth adding a note (in parentheses) to the ''Dependencies''
 section that some package['s ordinary build] does ''not'' depend on
 {{{xy}}} especially if (e.g) the upstream contains source files for /
 files (usually) to be processed by {{{xy}}}, or in cases where the package
 ''previously'' depended on some package(s), but no longer does. (And even
 if there erroneously was some dependency listed in
 {{{spkg/standard/deps}}}.)

 Typical candidates for {{{xy}}} are Python, Perl, lex/flex, yacc/bison
 etc. (Autotools should not be listed.)

 Also, some packages only do ''not'' depend on some others (e.g. libraries)
 ''in Sage'' just because of the way we configure, patch or build / install
 them. IMHO as well worth a note.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9766#comment:29>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to