#9650: Adding support for differential forms
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: jvkersch | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5.3
Component: symbolics | Keywords: forms, functions, symbolics
Author: Joris Vankerschaver | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Niles Johnson | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment(by niles):
Replying to [comment:33 jvkersch]:
> OK, I've updated the patch so that the methods which are not applicable
raise `NotImplementedError`. I don't know if I've done this properly
though, since including all the doctests this amounts to quite a bit of
additional code.
This looks great, and I agree with others on getting it included into sage
soon. There were some formatting errors in the new docstrings (need
newline between `EXAMPLES::` and indented code block), and since someone
else gave the positive review I just uploaded a corrected version (apply
only [attachment:trac9650_differential_forms_v2-reviewer.patch]).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9650#comment:42>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
