#9650: Adding support for differential forms
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: jvkersch | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5.3
Component: symbolics | Keywords: forms, functions, symbolics
Author: Joris Vankerschaver | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Niles Johnson | Merged:
Work_issues: diff() |
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment(by jason):
Replying to [comment:33 jvkersch]:
> Thanks for elucidating the role of `SR`. I don't think there is any
implicit coercion anywhere of forms into `SR`, so this probably won't give
any problems.
>
> Replying to [comment:32 niles]:
>
> >
> > For this ticket, I'd be in support of raising `NotImplementedError`s
for all of the broken inherited methods, and writing a new ticket to
implement those that can be.
>
> OK, I've updated the patch so that the methods which are not applicable
raise `NotImplementedError`. I don't know if I've done this properly
though, since including all the doctests this amounts to quite a bit of
additional code.
I think you've gone above and beyond the requirement with this last one.
Thanks! Again, I think the code looks good. If someone else wants to
give a final positive review on the mathematical foundation, let's mark
this positive review and get it in.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9650#comment:34>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
