#9850: make style of documentation consistent with sagemath.org
------------------------------------------------------------+---------------
   Reporter:  niles                                         |       Owner:  
mvngu       
       Type:  defect                                        |      Status:  
needs_review
   Priority:  major                                         |   Milestone:  
sage-4.6    
  Component:  documentation                                 |    Keywords:  
style       
     Author:  Niles Johnson                                 |    Upstream:  N/A 
        
   Reviewer:  Mitesh Patel, John Palmieri, Minh Van Nguyen  |      Merged:      
        
Work_issues:                                                |  
------------------------------------------------------------+---------------
Changes (by mvngu):

  * status:  new => needs_review
  * reviewer:  => Mitesh Patel, John Palmieri, Minh Van Nguyen
  * milestone:  => sage-4.6


Old description:

> This was proposed in the following thread at `sage-devel`:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
> devel/browse_thread/thread/73e3c4c995577df0
>
> and a few people voiced support, so a patch will be attached.

New description:

 This was proposed in the following thread at `sage-devel`:

 http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
 devel/browse_thread/thread/73e3c4c995577df0

 and a few people voiced support, so a patch will be attached.

 '''Apply:'''

  1. [attachment:trac_9850_doc_style.patch]
  1. [attachment:trac_9850-reviewer.patch]

--

Comment:

 When (re)building documentation, I would first delete the whole output
 directory and then proceed with the (re)building:

 {{{
 #!sh
 $ cd SAGE_ROOT
 $ rm -rf devel/sage-main/doc/output/
 $ ./sage -docbuild --no-pdf-links all html 2>&1 | tee -a dochtml.log
 }}}

 This guarantees that the documentation I'm interested in (re)building
 would build, regardless of whether I have made any changes. In niles' case
 where changes were observed to not take place, I find the approach above
 worked for me. With that in mind, I have attached a reviewer patch with
 the following changes:

  * Use a very pale yellow for the code background colour.
  * Annotate most of the hex colour code with descriptive English names.
 All names were taken from [http://www.perbang.dk this site].

 See the attachment [attachment:reviewer-style.png] for a preview of the
 new colour for the code background. I'm OK with niles' patch. What we need
 now is for someone other than me to look over my changes.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9850#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to