#9799: Running "make" in SAGE_ROOT returns the wrong exit code, leading to all
kinds of confusion
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: GeorgSWeber
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: build | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by mpatel):
Replying to [comment:4 jhpalmieri]:
> > For upgrades from Sage versions without pipestatus: What if we create
pipestatus in the makefile instead of in spkg/install?
>
> I may be wrong about this, but if you run "sage -upgrade", then I don't
think "makefile" gets upgraded. So if we just modify makefile, we can
assume that we have pipestatus available to us: people upgrading won't get
the new makefile, and people building from scratch will have
spkg/pipestatus.
You're right. Your idea is simpler and better.
I can't test V3 right now, but here or elsewhere, should we rewrite the
`test` target so it works like the other testing targets?
On renaming `makefile`: Does any platform (Windows?) require the current
name?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9799#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
