#9359: Get number field coverage up to 100%
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: davidloeffler | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: number fields | Keywords: doctest
Author: David Loeffler | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by jdemeyer):
Also, the hunk
{{{
- sage: I.ideal_below()
- Fractional ideal (-b) # 32-bit
- Fractional ideal (b) # 64-bit
+ sage: I.ideal_below() == F.ideal(b)
+ True
}}}
conflicts with #9764. So would you mind removing it?
Apart from that, the patch applies fine and doctests fine, even with #9753
and #9764 applied.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9359#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
