#9359: Get number field coverage up to 100%
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: davidloeffler | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: number fields | Keywords: doctest
Author: David Loeffler | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by davidloeffler):
In my defence, I'd like to point out that your comment applies to most of
the 600 or so number field doctests that were already there -- not just
the 38 that I added -- and nobody's complained about it before :-) So we
could have another ticket if you think it's an issue, but I claim it's
orthogonal to this ticket.
(I personally think having the doctests this way is a ''good'' thing, as
it makes it clear that you can start Sage and type {{{K.<a> = Number
Field(x^2 - 37)}}} and it will Just Work (tm), unlike in Magma for
instance.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9359#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
