#8820: elliptic_exponential broken for curves over number fields
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  robertwb         |       Owner:  cremona   
       Type:  enhancement      |      Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  major            |   Milestone:  sage-4.6  
  Component:  elliptic curves  |    Keywords:            
     Author:  John Cremona     |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:                   |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                   |  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by wuthrich):

  * status:  needs_review => needs_work


Comment:

 I get doctest failures, like the typical case below. It should be
 considered numerical noise, but somehow it is not a very good example
 then. I think a point (1,1) would give a more convincing example.

 {{{
 File "/local/pmzcw/prog/sage-4.5/devel/sage-
 test/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/period_lattice.py", line 1424:
     sage: Li[0].elliptic_exponential(zi[0])
 Expected:
     (2.17701177381006e-16 + 2.21973923391111e-16*I : 1.11022302462516e-16
 - 2.21990394816407e-16*I : 1.00000000000000)
 Got:
     (2.17818031662168e-16 + 2.22022549601564e-16*I : 1.11022302462516e-16
 - 2.22044604925031e-16*I : 1.00000000000000)
 }}}

 The lines that fail are 1424, 1426, 1428, 1440, 1450, 1452.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8820#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to