#8820: elliptic_exponential broken for curves over number fields
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: cremona
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: elliptic curves | Keywords:
Author: John Cremona | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment(by cremona):
Replying to [comment:5 wuthrich]:
> I get doctest failures, like the typical case below. It should be
considered numerical noise, but somehow it is not a very good example
then. I think a point (1,1) would give a more convincing example.
>
> {{{
> File "/local/pmzcw/prog/sage-4.5/devel/sage-
test/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/period_lattice.py", line 1424:
> sage: Li[0].elliptic_exponential(zi[0])
> Expected:
> (2.17701177381006e-16 + 2.21973923391111e-16*I :
1.11022302462516e-16 - 2.21990394816407e-16*I : 1.00000000000000)
> Got:
> (2.17818031662168e-16 + 2.22022549601564e-16*I :
1.11022302462516e-16 - 2.22044604925031e-16*I : 1.00000000000000)
> }}}
>
> The lines that fail are 1424, 1426, 1428, 1440, 1450, 1452.
Which version is that? The patch says 4.5!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8820#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
