#9049: v4.4.1 bug in variety() over finite field extensions of Q?
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: cynthia_vinzant | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: linear algebra | Keywords:
Author: Andrey Novoseltsev | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Burcin Erocal | Merged:
Work_issues: |
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment(by novoselt):
I thought about it, but I was not sure if it is necessary somewhere later
to have exactly list, rather than tuple. Also, since the point of this
try-block is to see whether or not it is possible to perform certain
conversion, I think that any exception resulting from "wrong" conversion
can be intercepted. If we just skip it for tuples, will we need later to
skip it for, say, sequences? So I would prefer to stick with my patch as I
think it is more universal. What do you think?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9049#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
