#4539: plural wrapper
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  burcin       |       Owner:  OleksandrMotsak, AlexanderDreyer
       Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  needs_review                    
   Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  sage-4.6                        
  Component:  algebra      |    Keywords:                                  
     Author:               |    Upstream:  N/A                             
   Reviewer:               |      Merged:                                  
Work_issues:               |  
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------

Comment(by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:32 nthiery]:
 > I started playing with ideals. Currently, one creates an ideal I, and
 > then when one calls I.std() or I.twostd() to create a new left or
 > twosided ideal, and actually compute the Groebner basis. What about
 > the following variants:

 Currently, if R is a commutative ring and L is a list of elements of R,
 one may use the shorthand notation {{{I = R*L}}} or {{{I = L*R}}} to
 create an ideal. It seems natural to me to extend this to the non-
 commutative case: {{{R*L}}} for left ideal,  {{{L*R}}} for right ideal,
 and {{{R*L*R}}} for two-sided ideal.

 How to implement it? Well, on could have a base class for ideals over non-
 commutative rings (let's call it {{{NCIdeal}}}), and derive from it
 {{{NCIdeal_left}}}, {{{NCIdeal_right}}}, {{{NCIdeal_twodsided}}}.

 Then, one has to modify the multiplication method for rings so that
 sidedness is taken care of (there is a method ideal_class(), that probably
 needs to accept an optional argument "side"). And of course, the one-sided
 ideal classes need a multiplication method as well.

 And then, {{{NCIdeal_twodsided.groebner_basis()}}} would yield a two-sided
 Gröbner basis, while {{{NCIdeal_left/right.groebner_basis()}}} would only
 yield a one-sided Gröbner basis, of course unless a two-sided Gröbner
 basis is requested by using an optional argument.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4539#comment:33>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to