#9920: Ease SageNB development by providing hg commands, and extracting packages
to /devel
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: timdumol | Owner: jason, was
Type: defect | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: notebook | Keywords:
Author: Tim Dumol | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jason Grout | Merged:
Work_issues: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by timdumol):
Replying to [comment:7 jason]:
> Replying to [comment:6 mpatel]:
> > The extcode, sage_scripts, and sage packages use Mercurial in their
`spkg-install`s to merge changes into an existing repository. This could
be more efficient than copying every file every time. Can we do that
here?
>
> Can we make a new ticket for that?
>
> In fact, I like this approach better (backup and copy), since it plays
nicely with patch queues. The merge approach messes everything up if you
forgot to pop all of your patches off.
I agree with Jason.
>
> >
> > Does the new `spkg-install` now install SageNB two places, under
`site-packages` and `devel`? Is it practical to do just the latter?
>
>
> No, I don't think it installs twice (you can check the files to make
sure). The setup.py develop installs under $SAGE_ROOT/devel/ and changes
the site-packages folder to refer to that location.
Actually, it does, but doing so is needed for the docs to show (static
docs). We can make another ticket for that.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9920#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
