#9925: Doctest error in sage/graphs/graph.py
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: doctest | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: | Author: Nathann Cohen
Upstream: N/A | Reviewer: Dmitrii Pasechnik
Merged: sage-4.6.alpha2 | Work_issues:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by ncohen):
Well, as you had taken the time to write this testing function, I tested
it against the patches (with n = 10 000, as I was working on a sheet of
paper at the same time and did not mind forgetting it for several minutes
`:-D`) :
With #9422 applied :
{{{
#!python
sage: runner(10000)
0
}}}
With no patch applied, but with
{{{
#!python
g = graphs.RandomBipartite(10, 10, .5)
}}}
replaced by
{{{
#!python
g = Graph(graphs.RandomBipartite(10, 10, .5))
}}}
in your code (which is exactly what the docstring in #10067 does) :
{{{
#!python
sage: runner(10000)
0
}}}
Be sure that this is not just a statistical proof : #9422 "disconnects"
the call to the ``is_subgraph`` command, so there is really no path left
leading to this exception from BipartiteGraph !
Nathann
P.S. : Thank you for this ``#!python`` trick ! Very nice `;-)`
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9925#comment:29>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
