#9864: Error building PIL on RHEL Server 5.5
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: GeorgSWeber
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: build | Keywords:
Author: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by mpatel):
Replying to [comment:15 leif]:
> I'm pretty sure we can simply delete the ''first occurrence'' of
{{{
#!python
add_directory(library_dirs, "/usr/local/lib")
# FIXME: check /opt/stuff directories here?
}}}
If I comment out this `add_directory` line, PIL builds successfully on
rosemary. The doctests that didn't pass previously -- in
`plot/plot3d/base.pyx` -- now pass.
Does anyone see a reason to keep this line for any platform? Has it not
caused problems on other systems, because the systems haven't had a
`/usr/local/lib/libpython2.6.a`?
> Who knows if at all the indentation is correct? The comment '''below'''
apparently refers to the (closed) {{{elif}}}-Darwin branch.
{{{/usr/local/lib}}} is added ''again'' later (in the code, in the snippet
Dave gave above), '''after''' {{{SAGE_LOCAL/lib}}} and {{{/usr/lib}}}, but
since it's already in the path, the Sage directory ends up in the middle.
Indeed, with the original line, I get
{{{
#!python
['/usr/local/lib',
'/home/buildbot/build/sage/rosemary-1/rosemary_full/build/sage-4.6.1.alpha2/local/lib',
'/usr/lib'] # library_dirs
['libImaging',
'/home/buildbot/build/sage/rosemary-1/rosemary_full/build/sage-4.6.1.alpha2/local/include',
'/usr/local/include', '/usr/include'] # include_dirs
}}}
but without it, I get
{{{
#!python
['/home/buildbot/build/sage/rosemary-1/rosemary_full/build/sage-4.6.1.alpha2/local/lib',
'/usr/local/lib', '/usr/lib'] # library_dirs
['libImaging',
'/home/buildbot/build/sage/rosemary-1/rosemary_full/build/sage-4.6.1.alpha2/local/include',
'/usr/local/include', '/usr/include'] # include_dirs
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9864#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
